At NaNoCon 2025, an incident allegedly occurred between two attendees, Elliott Martin and Nancy Viswanathan.

Nancy states she gave a statement on site at NaNoCon and asked to handle things herself, but later filed a police report, the police investigation was closed and no charges were filed against Elliott. Despite this, Nancy released a notarized statement in February 2026 (statement is linked below and included in the downloads tab). A response to her notarized letter is below. It was compiled by AJ Ruley with testimony and documentation from several witnesses and those who had close relationships/friendships with Nancy.

Response To Nancy's Letter

This document was compiled by AJ Ruley — Ways To Human ("I" and "me" in this document).

I can be reached at wth.waystohuman@gmail.com.

A notarized letter signed by Nancy Viswanathan (ApostateSisters, 44) has been made public regarding her accusations against Elliott Martin (Secular Rarity, 31) at NaNoCon 2025. This document addresses some statements found in this letter. Full letter: Nancy Viswanathan's Notarized Letter

The blue text screenshots in this document are excerpts from Nancy's letter dated Feb 25, 2026.

Feb 25, 2026 To Whom it May Concern, On the night of July 25, 2025, during NaNoCon 2025, a horrifying incident took place within the concrete back stairwell of The Lodge at Montgomery Bell in Burns, TN. This incident would not only be the most cruel and brutal, disparaging, humiliating, and frightening event that I've ever endured, the things that transpired following would also be the most dehumanizing. Over six months later I’m still reeling from the shock and only now do I feel I have the strength to release the full story... straight from me.

Incorrect. July 25, 2025 was a Friday. The alleged incident took place on Saturday, July 26, 2025.

PRIVACY

Many of us have refused to speak publicly about this situation because Nancy wanted it to be private, we followed her requests. Many people, including Patti, violated those wishes from day 1. We have kept her privacy as long as possible but at this time, there is too much at stake and too much harm done in Nancy's name.

Nancy & AJ:

Nancy Viswanathan, Active 23h ago. But also nobody else will know other than the board members and Greg, no hosts, no moderators or crew etc. So you don't need to feel judged or like everyone is watching you, no one else knows other than those you have approved as far as I know. Well... helen did say she told Bre, but when I asked Patti she said she thinks you told Bre? Which means Dr Ben knows because they live together. Oh and that's fine. I know how drama works. People always want to be in the know. I'm not embarrassed or shamed by it. Everyone will figure it out eventually.

Nancy & KC Gleason:

NV / Nancy. I don't know what's going to happen with NaNoCon and the ACA at this point but I hope he's able to gain back their trust at some point. And I hope those people will talk to me first instead of just forming their own judgments on it. SR and I are truly the only ones that can know what transpired between us. Agreed. Yes, AJ said she would give my update to Maria at the ACA and Eliott Canter from NaNoCon reached out. I told him the same. So hopefully, nothing will be ruined for SR. I know he's learned his lesson. We will certainly keep your and his private information private. ruined for SR. 1k, Naney) arned his lesson “& We will certainly keep your and his private information private. And 'm glad AJ was part of the ACA stuff... Enough people know that don’t think it'll stay private for long, but that’s fine. It'll blow over eventually “& Given how you and he are both handling it, think we've got the best shot ar it beiny contained. honestly wanted it to stay between us to begin with, but understand that [Witness 1] felt she had to tell someone. She has her own traumas in this and I’m sure things triggered for her think you can trust the people who know at this…

* 'W1*' is Witness 1

AJ to Nancy:

& Nancy Viswanathan X Search know that if she did tell Seth, it's because she trusts him, but it is a little ~ Search in cor ! © discouraging to hear that others haven't respected your wishes that it not go any further.

GENERAL TIMELINE

All times are Central Time.

July 26, 2025, Saturday

  • Night time — NaNoCon alleged incident.

July 27, 2025, Sunday

  • Before 8 AM — Nancy gives a video statement about the alleged incident to Eliott Canter and a witness.
  • 11 AM — NaNoCon ends.

July 28, 2025, Monday

  • 10:30 PM — Patti calls me and shares the allegations (1 hour call).
  • 11:54 PM — After the call, Nancy emails KC Gleason a full statement.

July 29, 2025, Tuesday

  • 8:14 AM — I contact Nancy, she forwards me the email she sent KC.
  • Mid-morning — Nancy speaks to KC & John on the phone.
  • 4:00 PM — KC & John talk to Elliott on the phone.
  • 6–8 PM — Elliott, ACA board/producer and I (at Nancy's request) have a conference call. I used Nancy's email to tell her story.
  • 7:56 PM — Nancy emails Elliott a different email than the one KC, John & I got.
  • After 8 PM — After Elliott reads the email, he and Nancy talk on the phone.
  • After midnight — Call ends.

INCIDENT TIMELINE

JULY 26, Saturday

  • 5–6 PM — Elliott approaches Nancy at the bar; in the letter, she describes him as "a little drunk" at that point, but buys him 2 more drinks.
  • 8:30 PM — Glenda's Fire Show. I spent most of dinner (between 7 PM–9 PM) with Nancy, she had 2 glasses of wine, she appeared sober and clear minded while we talked. After the fire show, Nancy was still clear minded when I left the table. I immediately joined Elliott, my husband and another guest. We chatted for 20 mins, Elliott seemed very drunk at this point. We joked he would not wake up in time for his speech the next morning.
  • 9 PM — Dinner ends. People move to the Restaurant/Bar/Lobby (all in one room).
  • My family and I went to an event hosted outside. We returned to our room at 11:45 PM.
  • 9:30 PM — Glenda Jordan, Arden Hart and Dr Ben Hamilton observe Nancy aggressively kissing Elliott while he attempts to turn away from her kissing. Glenda considered intervening, until Nancy & Elliott got up and walked away together.
  • 10 PM — Glenda texts Arden (who walked away momentarily) stating Elliott and Nancy seemed to be NOW engaging in a consensual encounter, whereas previously they both perceived the encounter as one sided, with Nancy having initiated and Elliott looking uncomfortable, pulling away.
  • UNKNOWN — After Glenda observes them walking away, Nancy and Elliott walk outside together, come back in, still cozy, and go back to the bar.
  • 11 PM — An anonymous witness tries to get Elliott away from Nancy, fails and leaves.
  • 11 PM–12:00 AM — Sometime within this hour, Elliott and Nancy end up on the stairwell.
  • 12:15 AM–12:30 AM — Chad Harris helps Elliott look for the wallet. Dr Ben joins them.
  • 12:25 AM to 1:01 AM — Elliott and Dr Ben look around for Elliott's wallet.
  • UNKNOWN — It is not known exactly where Nancy was for those 45+ minutes, but she was texting Elliott during that time.
  • 12:55 AM–1 AM — [Witness 1] runs into Nancy in the hallway. Nancy states she just came out from the stairwell and alleged she had been attacked by Elliott moments before, despite not having been with him for AT LEAST 45 mins prior.

July 26, 2025 Saturday — 5–6 PM — After speeches end:

It was mid-afternoon in the lobby of The Lodge when I was approached by Elliott Martin (aka Secular Rarity). We had met in person for the first time briefly while attending the Ark Encounter protest in Kentucky only a couple weeks prior. We got to chatting, and since we were right by the bar, I offered to buy him a drink. He already seemed a little drunk, but I wasn’t going to police him. After two drinks, our conversation turned towards flirtatious, at least as far as I could tell from my end. Being in a monogamous marriage, I wasn’t worried

The bar is inside the restaurant, providing snacks, coffee and water.

July 26, 2025 Saturday — 9 PM — Dinner Ends. People go to the bar. At the bar:

point, I felt bold enough to tell him how cute he was and that I did have a bit of a crush on him. I noticed he was extremely drunk and/or on some kind of mind-altering substance because he was sweating profusely and talking erratically. He seemed surprised yet delighted by my admission and said he had no idea. He grabbed my hand and began leading me around to the various groups of people within the lobby and on the deck outside. Though I couldn’t __ understand his incoherent interaction with others, I just laughted because I was having a great eimesHe then abruptly pulled me out the front…

These accusations of drug use are likely meant to disparage Elliott's character.

Nancy, Patti and I discussed the possibility of drugs being involved. It was ruled out.

Alcohol is a mind altering substance which can lead to slurred and erratic speech.

Nancy knew Elliott was, in her own words, "extremely drunk". She admits to purchasing several drinks for Elliott herself.

Patti Robrahn & [7 7/29/25, 8:01AM No worries, you didn't wake me @ thank you for sending these. And OMG the & idea that he went and did coke or something is such an important point...yikes. a ©: ’ Patti Robrahn [7 7/30/25, 4:34PM a SR says he wasn't doing any hard drugs a time. He then abruptly pulled me out the front sliding doors of the hotel. I went willingly as I didn't believe I was in any kind of danger. I trusted him and considered him my friend, though I was unsure of what he was doing when all our other friends were inside. Once outside, this is when he said he knew I was married yet continued to shove me into the darkened alcove behind the door and kissed me aggressively, then stumbled and knocked us both to the ground. I helped him up, but the moment I did, he took my hand once more and led me through a different door that led to the back stairwell. I was still tipsy and not quite registering what we

Nancy says at this time she was "tipsy" and Elliott was "extremely drunk". She seems aware of the enormous difference in intoxication levels. Several witnesses described Nancy as sober and clear headed all night, and Elliott as falling down drunk. Reverse the gender roles for a moment.

To reach the stairwell from the alcove, they had to walk through a total of 3 doors, through the Lobby, in front of many people. Those in the lobby, main desk and bar would see them. People in the Lobby: John & KC Gleason, [Witness 1], Glenda Jordan, Arden Hart, Dr Ben.

Nancy claims she was taken from the alcove to the stairwell, however, witnesses observed Nancy and Elliott come back into the lobby, to the restroom and back to the bar, engaging with John Gleason, KC and others. (KC's witness statements below).

¢ —— — — \\ a Boardroom ’ Patio 7 t Outdoor — a- — : a Eco) Bra _ Alcove eer Pre-Function x inl a wn , Lobby om: 1 At ) 5 Women’s 3 Room 6 ) Gift Shop A2 B Lounge w A3 — — Restaurant Private Dining

Blue dashes indicate the path from the alcove to the stairwell.

Green X: KC Gleason and others sat there. Seating arrangement was different than pictured:

i, {PCT ae: Oe ai ) 5 Se eee Itc wie iwe) &

Venue map/photos source: https://tnstateparks.com/lodges/venues/montgomery-bell.

Witnesses reported Nancy and Elliott came back inside from the front doors and went to the bar, NOT to the stairwell. This happened later. KC Gleason (who does not drink) was on a seat near the Lobby Entrance door and witnessed the following:

KC, John <@ gt Active 5m ago v Lb KC wasn’t at the bar. was out in the lobby on the couch by the front door. have no idea how much people drank or their co diction. hd *condition 5:20PM Seen by everyone KC Yes, they walked right past me When they went outside _lsaw them. Kd Ss a 6 aG & Aa ® & KC, John <@ gt Active 5m ago X Lb 5:21PM Seen by everyone KC It didn't appear that way to me. They were holding hands and she seemed to be going willingly. And i saw them come back inside too. Headed back toward the bar. But didn't see them after that. They were still cozy when they came back inside. She was a little disheveled, pulling at her shirt and her hair was messed up a little. hid But she see’ y, fine. 6 aG & Aa ® wt KC, John <@ gt Active 5m ago X Ld pulling at her shirt and her hair was messed up a little. Kid But she seemed fine. KC No. But that was before the stairwell thing, that was when they went outside. think the stairwell thing was later. They came back in from Kd outside together KC _ when they came back in they headed to the bathrooms first, then back toward the bar. She stopped on her way to the bar to talk to @John Glez ah El didn't see where En._. went, 6 aQG & Aa ® it

Correction/Update (written by KC): Once other evidence and witness testimony came together, it became clear that there were not two separate incidents (outside and the stairwell), as I initially thought but one continuous incident. My initial thought that there were two separate incidents came from a combination of my first hand witness account and Nancy's email account. She said after she told him to stop, he ran off alone but I saw them come back to the lobby together. So I assumed when I saw them come back, it was after outside, but before the stairwell. However, given the timeline and alibis that were with Elliott from midnight to 1 am (looking for the phone, including in the stairwell), plus text messages from Nancy attempting to meet with with him and noting she was outside, and Nancy being with Witness 1 from 12:55 am, we know Nancy and Elliott did not see each other after midnight so the outside and stairwell had to be one continuous incident. We also know, given all this, that Nancy was not left in the stairwell alone to be found by Witness 1, as she came back to the lobby with Elliott, which I witness myself (recounting in screenshots above—though this correction is necessary, as I now have information that renders part of my perception incorrect. They had not come back into the lobby from outside, but from the stairwell, together, which makes the narrative that she was left alone in the stairwell and that Witness 1 found her there, just after the alleged incident, impossible. In fact, Witness 1 didn't run into Nancy until approximately an hour after the alleged incident could have taken place.

CNC & "COCK APPEARANCE"

Nancy and Patti's defense for discounting witnesses relies on claiming Elliott manipulated Nancy AND the community. The following screenshots indicate that, from day 1, Nancy told different versions of the story to different people at the same time, BEFORE she spoke to Elliott on the phone (where Patti says the manipulation first happened).

He led me up a flight of stairs and when he turned around, I noticed his eyes were black and lifeless. Sweat was still dripping off his face and hair... and he looked like the angriest person Thad ever seen. For the first time that night, I became scared of him. It was then that I flew violently down the stairs behind me, toppling over a couple times before my head smashed into the concrete wall. HE HAD JUST PUSHED ME down the stairs with both open palms! I eas Stn Wh ERA SEDC RIPERON SC Scene. eR Nd wenn oe Deen Oar Chae CPR Rs et CBRE TERE CeEPe7, GR him from this reaction) he released me. His cock also made a very brief appearance, to which I will spare the details, but just to Teiterate, NOTHING that occurred during this time was consensual. Not even close. If he actually thought this was some fun, fucked up act of sexual

July 29, 2025, Tuesday

7:56 PM — Nancy emails Elliott (SR) a statement, some parts are similar to the email sent to KC & John.

The following parts are vastly different and not mentioned at all in KC's email.

This was sent BEFORE Nancy spoke to Elliott after NaNoCon.

Patti has claimed Elliott manipulated Nancy's memory on that first call and then manipulated everyone in the community, convincing her that she consented, but these words came from Nancy. Her first contact with him about the incident came several hours after the email:

Nancy Viswanathan. Tuesday, Jul 29 · 7:56 PM. Hey SR, I just sent you an email. Feel free to read it and message me here anytime after. Thank you. I am in a meeting now and will read it in full as soon as I am done. Would you prefer I text or call? Either one is fine. Ok I'll be as fast as I can. No rush. Do whatever you need to. I will be back home in about 10 to 15 minutes is it all right if I call you?

After 8 PM — When Elliott's meeting ends after 9 PM, Nancy and Elliott talk on the phone for 3.5 hours. This corroborates the email was sent BEFORE she had any contact with Elliott about this incident:

€ CN] Nancy Viswanathan & will be back home in about 10 to 15 minutes is it all right if call you? Yeah, sounds good Wednesday, Jul 30 + 12:24 AM Goodnight again. really do appreciate our chat. Secular Rarity To: me- Sat, Mar 14 at 7:25 AM v -—— Forwarded message —— From: Nancy Viswanathan < a Date: Tue, Jul 29, 2025, 7:56 PM ‘Subject: Start of a Dialog... o_o Coimemncmee Hey there, SR, wanted to connect with you again about the incident over the Text Stitched remember your cock making its appearance, but felt so drunk by this point that don’t remember much of the details. almost feel like had asked you to take it out because some points of the night were turning me on, but I don’t remember if that was before or after you

Nancy's statement indicates she was not opposed to Elliott's penis "making an appearance".

Nancy describes walking into the stairwell and immediately being pushed down the stairs as they were going up, her shirt pulled up, then going back up the stairs and getting choked. It is unclear at what point she asked him to pull out his penis if the alleged attack began immediately upon entering the stairwell in the way she describes.

husband to leave me. They actually told him that I liked men to rape me! I suddenly knew exactly where all this came from. I remembered telling Elliott during one of our calls that I help women on my channel through their sexual trauma by suggesting they read dark erotica books in the genre of "consensual non-consent." I've found that reading this type of literature

There is no indication that kink, CNC or BDSM was involved in the incident, however, Nancy did bring up this topic to Elliott and several others at NaNoCon, then denied being into it in the letter, the following is not to shame her for her interest, but rather to show the inconsistencies.

Secular Rarity To: me - Sat, Mar 14 at 7:25 AM. Forwarded message from Nancy Viswanathan, Date: Tue, Jul 29, 2025, 7:56 PM, Subject: Start of a Dialog... Hey there, SR, wanted to connect with you again about the incident over the Text Stitched. Have reacted more positively in this moment because consensual non-consent is a strong kink of mine and this probably turned me on in the moment, which you might have picked up on and thought was okay to perform. In all honesty, may have been more lucky that you did get too physically rough so could avoid feeling…

Patti and Nancy have both publicly denied Nancy being into Consensual Non-Consent (CNC). However, Nancy confessed this to several people including: Elliott (SR), Helen, Bre, Glenda Jordan and discussed it on the ApostateSisters channel with Patti.

om ¢* Nancy Viswanathan Yes! I'm very much into consensual non consent. And agreed. There @ are steps to take. ° — . =

August 1, 2025

Nancy and Patti recorded a show about Kink. In this video, Nancy makes a "confession" about CNC (1 WEEK After NaNoCon). In the video Nancy and Patti admit discussing the topic of CNC "at length". Being into Kink is perfectly fine! Publicly lying about it repeatedly to protect yourself is not.

Video at: https://tinyurl.com/KinkCoachVideo (60 secs)

This came from NANCY every time. Patti and Nancy have denied this publicly, except in the video and in several messages. CNC does not negate harm can happen, but it's inconsistent with their public claims.

my distain, because he sat right next to me throughout the rest of Patti’s presentation. I could feel all eyes on us, and I knew everyone was thinking we had sex the night prior. I think he

Nancy expresses feeling ashamed that people thought she had a sexual encounter with Elliott.

Witness accounts and lobby footage indicate things went beyond "harmless flirting", crossing physical boundaries. Nancy pursued Elliott at the bar, aggressively kissed him while he attempted to turn away from her.

Screenshots are from [Witness 1]'s FB post, witness accounts from the lobby:

Glenda Jordan: I feel compelled to share my thoughts, I sincerely hope you can remain open and receptive as this is obviously a charged situation. I don't even know where to start with that YouTube video. From the violent threats to the constant misogynistic slurs, it was difficult to get through. I will start with Patti's claim that Nancy was just flirty. That is not what I personally witnessed. I genuinely almost got up from my table outside to intervene on behalf of SR because she was so aggressive and handsy with him and he was turning his head to avoid French kissing. Later they left together hand in hand, every indicator of going to enjoy a consensual experience together and I even texted a friend at the time to that affect, noting relief that it seemed mutual and not just Nancy pursuing one sidedly.

Continued from Glenda Jordan:

the victim. From the screenshots shared here, Nancy is NOT BEING CONSULTED FOR THIS. Where is she????? Did she consent to this video?? This is such an egregious violation of her privacy and her wishes for what SHE WANTED, as others have pointed out with receipts, that I don't hardly have the words for how violating this feels. If someone did this to me after an incident I don't even know how I'd manage. I'm so concerned for Nancy and this video again is such a disgusting violation. At the bar, Nancy expressed sexual desires and private information with me that has direct bearing on what happened and while that context matters, I will not be sharing those details here as it would be unethical to do so without her consent. I'm a rape and sexual assault survivor. Multiple incidents. I've had failed scenes, been bruised and violated and traumatized. There are people out there that foam at the

Glenda tagged Arden and Ben to clarify whether they had seen the same:

Arden Hart in reply to Glenda Jordan: I just want to second everything said here by Glenda. I was also at the table and witnessed everything alongside her, and my recollection was exactly the same. I haven't been following the fall out super closely after the fact. But that's what I saw. I would probably have believed and taken Nancy's word for it if I hadn't witnessed what I did myself. Torben Hamilton: I was at the table with Glenda Jordan and Arden Hart and remember the same. I haven't had the energy lately to weigh in because I don't think I can articulate my thoughts very well.

THE STAIRWELL

July 26, 2025, Saturday

Nancy claims Elliott dragged her from the outdoor alcove to the stairwell where the alleged incident took place. She followed SR up the stairs and came out the door to the lobby between 12:55 and 1 AM, at this time she ran into [Witness 1], minutes after the alleged attack.

The exchange below between Elliott and Nancy does not line up with that description:

& CN} Nancy Viswanathan QQ: Sunday, Jul 27 + 12:25 AM Nancy! You and need to talk! I'm in the same spot I'll find you I need my wallet lol Come outside Please lol come to the front lobby Are you in the lobby?

From Elliott's phone, the following are the timestamps for the texts:

  • 12:25 AM — Elliott: Nancy! You and I need to talk!
    Nancy: I'm in the same spot
    Elliott: I'll find you. I need my wallet
  • 12:28 AM — Nancy: Come outside.
  • 12:38 AM — Elliott: Please lol come to the front Lobby.
  • 12:55 AM — [Witness 1] runs into Nancy.
  • 1:01 AM — Elliott: Are you in the Lobby?

Elliott recalls being in the stairwell before looking for the wallet. He and Dr Ben looked for the wallet in the stairwell.

"Come to the lobby" at 12:38 AM and "Are you in the lobby?" at 1:01 AM suggests they never found each other between those times.

Chad Harris helped Elliott look for his wallet from 12:15 AM to around 12:30 AM.

Chad (5) I was high as fuck, but remember helping SR look for his wallet t.) Chad Nah. He was definitely drunk/high/something. had him empty his pockets and gave him a pat down. After we failed to find it in the dining area, he was like “It's okay man. It's just stuff. Everything can be replaced..." And proceeded (3) to wax drunkequent about the temporal nature of cash and shit Chad I was like "You should probably get some sleep.” Chad replied to you You don't happen to have any exact time of what time you helped him? Lik... know went back to my hotel shortly after that. apparently…

Elliott and Dr Ben looked for the wallet while Elliott and Nancy were texting. Dr Ben stated he and Elliott did not separate during this time and Elliot stated he went to bed after looking for the wallet with Dr Ben.

Dr Ben stated he and Elliott looked for the wallet in the stairwell at some point between 12:25 and 1 AM. Nancy was not there. It is unclear where she was during that time.

According to the evidence above, Nancy and Elliott's stairwell encounter happened before 12:15 AM.

The texts and witness accounts indicate Elliott was not with Nancy between 12:15 AM and 1:01 AM.

Conversation between Elliott and I about the individual timestamps above:

Come outside was sent at 12:28 please come to front lobby was at 12:38 and (=) are you in the lobby was at 1:01 Secular Rarity So actually do remember that message and I'm pretty sure we had already separated and did not get back together at that point I'm pretty positive the need to find my wallet come outside please come to the front lobby was all happening as Ben and were walking around looking for my wall Which means Nancy and had already parted ways from the stairwell because that was when Ben asked me are you even sober enough to consent and said (=) no neither of us are ¢ Fa Torben Hamilton ~ Active 1h ago 1- while looking for the wallet did you and SR ever split up and look in different spots or did you look together the entire time you looked? 2- How long would you say you looked? 10 min? An hour? 3- Did you both look in the stairwell by the elevator? We were in the same spot because wanted to make sure he got back to his room safely. It was probably 20 minutes or so. We were first by the bar, then the stairwell, then the outdoor area where we had dinner, then the hallway by 4 Fa) his room. We never found the wallet

12:55–1 AM — [Witness 1] runs into Nancy in the Lobby's hall.

9:46 as oe [Witness 1] OD ive Se AUG 26 AT 2:01PM Yep took a photo right before saw her, like mins before. Let me check the @ timestamp 7 Seen So it was 12:55am was just heading to bed ® when saw her O@aGe Ye ‘4a ® He led me up a flight of stairs and when he turned around, I noticed his eyes were black and lifeless. Sweat was still dripping off his face and hair... and he looked like the angriest person Thad ever seen. For the first time that night, I became scared of him. It was then that I flew violently down the stairs behind me, toppling over a couple times before my head smashed into the concrete wall. HE HAD JUST PUSHED ME down the stairs with both open palms! I

Nancy does not make it clear what she believes Elliott's motivation for the completely unprovoked alleged assault was.

Below Nancy states the push down the stairs was likely accidental. Elliott recalled they both shoved each other against walls, passionately, and he fell down the stairs with her, but unsure of how exactly that happened due to intoxication levels that led to blackouts. Earlier in the letter, Nancy described him falling down in the alcove because he was so drunk and unsteady on his feet.

Texts from August 4, 2025 — Nancy and Seth (AmbushedApostate):

03:56 Sm LP 25) € i) Nancy Viswanathan & Yeah, was as accurate as could be in my description. The only thing he disagreed with, was that he claimed he didn’t push me down the stairs. If that’s actually the case, then he likely was trying to shove me into the wall but fell and lost my footing on the steps. Either way, it all

Nancy & AJ:

Nancy and AJ chat from August 4, 2025 10:37 as os <jge Nancy Viswanathan think it boils down to whether he actually had intentions to hurt me or not, and don't think @ hedia
my shirt back down, then he walked up the stairs. I followed cautiously, assuming we were returning to the lobby, which I was relived about.

Nancy follows her alleged attacker up the stairs. After the first push/fall down the stairs, they were next to the door where they entered the stairwell, which led back to the lobby (same level as the alcove).

Once we both reached the platform of the steps halfway up, he spun around yet again... and STRANGLED ME WITH BOTH HANDS! This lasted several seconds, long enough for me

Nancy describes a second attack for no apparent reason while she was following him up the steps.

SENDS 2 2 a i ae _ ee id happened. I slowly made my way up the stairs, leaving from the door Elliott had exited out of a moment ago. Once in the lobby, [Witness 1] noticed me. We were on

After the second alleged attack at the platform, Nancy states she followed Elliott up the stairs and out the same door he exited.

The original entry point was down the stairs, at lobby level (same level as the alcove). It is not clear how she went up a flight of stairs and came out at lobby level where [Witness 1] found her.

*Witness 1 (listed in Nancy's letter above, redacted upon request)

The following photos were taken the morning of Sunday, July 27, 2025 on the last day of NaNoCon 2025, the morning following the alleged attack (claims of which included being pushed down the stairs and violent strangulation). There are no visible bruises on Nancy's neck or arms (although certain types of bruises can take longer to develop and she could have had other bruises, covered by clothing). There are, however, visible bruises on Elliott's forearm near the elbow and a large dark bruise below the knee (shown in the group photo).

Nancy, morning of July 27, 2025 — arm visible Nancy, morning of July 27, 2025 — neck and clavicle visible Nancy with two other attendees, morning of July 27, 2025 Elliott, morning of July 27, 2025 — forearm visible near the elbow On-stage panel, morning of July 27, 2025 — Elliott seated at right

DANGEROUS OR NOT?

I felt obligated to warn women I felt close to at the time to ensure they kept their guard up around him. When tragedy occurs, it can often bring people closer, and these conversations did

Nancy told several women it was safe to share a house with Elliott in Austin the weekend of August 16, 2025 for the ACA's "Bat Cruise". She also asked ME to tell the ACA she wanted Elliott to continue working with them and attend this in-person event.

& Nancy Viswanathan YG ew ¢ Thank you. Can you please pass along my decisions and outcomes with the ACA? I'd like him to still be involved in all those things as scheduled. As far as I'm concerned, this is now dealt with. He doesn’t need to be punished further And thank you for having such an amazing heart as well. feel like you understood @B_where was coming from the entire time. This is the goal wanted For the next few days, we had some kind of interaction daily, either through texts or phone calls. I wanted to ensure he was checking in with me, so I kept the dialogue going by asking how his day was or sending pictures of something I was doing that day. And not one of these conversations were of a sexual nature. Though much of the interaction was great, one of the

Nancy and Elliott discuss the Bat Cruise on August 5, a week after the alleged incident. Nancy asks Elliott to rub Helen's breasts. This indicates she did not consider him a danger to other women. Text between Nancy and Elliott:

€ CN) Nancy Viswanathan & : Are you going to BAHACON? Or just the Bat Cruise? Who likes the French lol Just the B&BCruise What about you? Neither, unfortunately. Think used up my atheist convention cards for this year already But please do rub my online wifey’s tits when you're at the cruise. As long as Helen consents. Tell her it’s from me

The Bat Cruise took place Aug 16. Texts between Elliott and Nancy, days after the Bat Cruise, Nancy expresses wishing she had been there:

& Nancy Viswanathan ®& ? Tuesday, Aug 19 + 10:16 AM Hey, great show on Sunday. That Ulrich had me cracking up when he started talking about buttholes. Haha Bat Cruise looked super fun, too. I’m super bummed missed that one Hope you're doing good. :-) Tuesday, Aug 19 - 2:17 PM Oh my gosh right LOL like dude get over yourself But yeah the whole weekend was absolutely amazing so cool to get to see a bunch of people one lady came from the Netherlands and stayed for like 2 weeks oe

The following messages were sent on August 22nd, hours before Nancy removed everyone in the community from her FB and disappeared. While not explicit, this message shows Nancy had been aware many of us were staying in Austin, where Elliott would be staying in the same house with several women in the community:

Ci Nancy Viswanathan Cee 8/22/25, 11:03AM Hey luv, just emailed you viewer access to my content creator contact list @_t does need to be updated again soon, but this will bea good start

OTHER ALLEGED VICTIMS

Another revelation that cemented my decision to press charges was another victim of Elliott’s who came out. All this time, Patti was working diligently, with my consent, to ensure her sister received justice and that my abuser was stopped and held responsible for his actions. While I can’t elaborate on the details as there are people I need to protect, I knew then that this WASN’T AN ISOLATED EVENT. IT WAS A PATTERN.

This is irrelevant. If we're going to discuss patterns but not give evidence… There are 5 people Nancy approached attempting to engage in sexual encounters at past conferences. 3 men at different in-person gatherings and 2 women at NaNoCon before approaching Elliott, she also offered to have a threesome on 2 occasions… Until these individuals come forward, it's hearsay in the same way Nancy's "another victim of Elliott's" is hearsay.

SETH HENDERSON / AMBUSHED APOSTATE

sent privately and used to create an elaborate story that somehow made me the villain. Seth of Ambushed Apostate even concocted a fallacious story that I tried to engage in a sexual relationship with him and that he wanted me to leave my husband for him! It would be almost

Nancy denies having a sexually explicit relationship with Seth from AmbushedApostate, the following conversations are between Nancy and Seth after NaNoCon. Their first interaction immediately following NaNoCon is this message the same day Nancy gave her statement to E. Canter. In the texts Nancy brags about how much fun she had and says she partied too hard, sending photos of her and Elliott, among others:

03:31 e4@ axe EPr:--) @ 0) Nancy Viswanathan % : P< ® Nancy Viswanathan %, Friday Ju 252021 a Yall don't party too hard tonight! hope ‘today was amazing! I didn’t keep my promise. Ended up_ - iN % partying too hard. Haha = Alright get it Sunday ul 27-1839 Rub it in why don't ya saw some of the livestream and I'm just e s0 jealous! Dave fucking warnock! Seth. A ton of an amazing folks. 6) we/ I'm sure the after party was & & & i v s yy a

The following are sexually explicit conversations between Nancy and Seth (AmbushedApostate). These are simply included to show the letter misrepresents Nancy's relationship with Seth, it shows it was of a sexual nature:

was thinking on shtne's gonna tip: e Oh I'm sure you have bought stock in them hahah And Sumanth is so HOT! It’s unfair Especially after all of this really hot content yal have been making just want to say “bro, she really wants to suck your dick. What is your deal?!?" Oh Patti has the hottest sex life ever right now! She and the hubby are freaks. And her additional partner, for a time Yall both have it in the eyes but you have it way more noticeably © @ vereyviswenatnan Right?! Maybe he’s just such an analytical person that just have to say, “Okay, we're having sexnow Lets getittiched off our To Do list” Maybe he’s frustrated that don’t have a dick. That's why he needs skydiving, snowboarding, scuba diving... all those ‘extreme sports to blow off steam Doesn't compute with me. I'm the type of guy that actually enjoyed doing the work for 20-30 mins before ever put d to p. like taking my time and making sure she's eo igemuleihiane sea aera no box to tick in my opinion @ ® Nancy Viswanathan ei And if you tell him how bad you need it and he shuts you down. We'll revisit it Thanks. Yeah, gotta run some errands but will u be available for a call later? l appreciate this chat. Now the floodgate is open Yeah text me first and if don't answer, took a power nap. « Floodgates are an interesting way of putting it © Haha. Yeah. That was on purpose e
© @ vereyviswenatnan Okay, now you're just teasing. Every yroman wants that!lGood on you for being that guy ‘And yeah, it’s super taboo to be gay in India. He probably wouldn’t even admit it Oh this isn’t teasing haha. This is just the factuals € ® Nancy Viswanathan %_ i Like, you are gonna need some meat on your bones so you don't get broken lol Yeah think not sweating all of it off before can gainit will help For sure! Never had any complaints about the junk in the trunk If anyone complains, send them to me and I'll straighten em out haha In my experience, tall skinny dudes usually have huge cocks. And most women know this. I'm sure you're doing just fine Iwouldn't say huge but I've got it figured ‘out. think that's more important to most chicks. Even if it's a ball bat, it's not great if you don't know how to use it.
€ i) Nancy Viswanathan & Dude eats her pussy within two minutes of the show starting. @ Dude knows what's up. That's part of the reason didn't skim the files before sent them. usually just look the download ‘over for quality but didn't wanna see anything until can watch it all © @ rereyViswenethan & I'm glad! And hopefully you'll learn something from it, too. Inside the scary mind of the horny suburban housewife I'l keep ya posted. I'm gonna finish my shift and hit the door at 10. Enjoy cleaning jin your sweatpants and bra less tee @ @ Totally! v All right so I'm waiting in line for a shower. figured I should get clean. picked up where left off on episode one. This is the part you asked totally normal in the trucker lounge like you're not watching porn & e

Immediately following these conversations, Nancy tells Seth she wishes he could come stay with her. Sent on August 10, 2025, while her husband was in India:

€ ND Nancy Viswanathan Q : A lot of people don't make it out of these situations and that's crazy . don't like being that close to something it takes so many people out But unless my ticker just stops ticking, I'm about to beat this level and I'm excited about it Yeah, think Memphis will be great for you. Hard on you, but will be awesome in the long run Really wish you come and stay here for a couple weeks or so That would be extremely helpful nancy. It just sucks it so far away because by the time get up there to stay there will have spent most of the money have saved up to get to…

See Seth Henderson's notarized statement about his relationship with Nancy: Seth Henderson's Notarized Statement

CAMERA FOOTAGE

void. The only footage authorities were able to retrieve were from the lobby where Elliott and I were engaged in obvious flirtation. No footage existed from the back stairwell where the

Flirtation and physical sexual contact are completely different things. Glenda Jordan, Arden Hart and Dr Ben described Nancy initiating the aggressive kissing. There is no problem with describing a non-consensual allegation of harm during an otherwise consensual sexual interaction and separating the two.

If the footage is from the lobby, authorities would have timestamps of many of the night's interactions and movements. They would potentially see Ben, Elliott & Chad walking around, Nancy and [Witness 1] meeting near the lobby, Nancy and Elliott walking toward the stairwell and out the front door. It would show where Nancy went after the stairwell, Nancy kissing Elliott at the bar, etc.

MARITAL STRUGGLES

least as far as I could tell from my end. Being in a monogamous marriage, I wasn’t worried about anything happening while attending one of these conferences as I knew myself and wasn’t the type of person to cheat on their spouse. After ten years of marriage, I still never have. I also believed that men of the atheist community were different, such that I could be good friends with men and not worry about any sexual advances or unwanted attention against my wishes. So, I relaxed and engaged in what I thought was some harmless flirtation. I had seen Elliott on atheist channels before and found…

Helen & Nancy:

945 200+ oor € rig Nancy Viswanat.. “\ @ @ JUL3t AT6#2eM Well, we've never met in person, $0. I seriously wish I were single sometimes. So many incredible ‘opportunities with hot people like wand Bre But I definitely had my wild days @® Mlle vicariously through u I think he has serious sexual trauma, And his difference of culture makes it hard to talk to him about it. But 'm working on it. Ireally do love him. But !'m seriously sexually frustrated. It wears on me

Nancy to Helen 2 days after telling her about the incident:

@ Nancy Viswanathan cn awesome vibrators to keep me satisfied. But do feel my situation sort of led me to Eliott’s arms in the first place. Clearly I’m needing @ mr There are definitely great aspects to my marriage for sure. know @ how fortunate am. But the bedroom department absolutely sucks

Nancy and AJ Chat:

@ Nancy Viswanathan . oe 0 ll — Tisntaain iereenintpete ill ett) I aiemyemaalaniepeo meme mitted me into Elliott's arms in the first place. Once this all settles down a bit, I'd love to chat BS _withyouabout ys more 8/2/25, 4:34PM Thecvecemgetcrenicdye © ® =
just that. My talks with Elliott soon started to fade off as I began to not trust him, and 1 steered more towards these other content creators for conversation and comfort. With my husband still

While Nancy's husband was in India, Nancy spoke to Elliott daily. In the following message to AmbushedApostate, Nancy says she "stopped trusting him" because she thought he was young and dumb, rather than because of the alleged incident.

Nancy & AmbushedApostate:

€ N Nancy Viswanathan & Oh, I’m fine now. I’m now in the “Elliott can go fuck himself” stage. Haha Oh yeah? How did that change take place? After talking with him for a few days, concluded he’s just kind of young and dumb. It helped me get over my attraction to him just have a weakness for men with long hair. I’m sure you've noticed Ohhhh so it's the long hair that does it? That makes sense. Too made it doesn't equal being a mature adult Yeah, that’s very true. made the connection recently. mean, Elliott, Aron Ra, Dan Vasc... was like Oh, think have a type Received 8/13/25, 09:34

Nancy and Elliott talked until Nancy left the community. On Aug 20, Nancy tells Elliott if he ever wants to "drink, smoke and vent" let her know, while in the letter she accuses him of using drugs/alcohol and insinuating he has a drug problem (false allegations):

€ Nancy Viswanathnn & ? <€ Nancy Viswanathan QQ i? Gh Wednesday, Aug 20 - 12:57 PM I'll encourage you any way can, because The Nashville area seems to have so many ; . do see it. It can be hard to push past our great options for the atheist community. . aan Age ‘own negative thoughts. And when life Chicago is really lacking in that, but : guess you guys need it far more down gets busy, it makes it even worse there in the Bible Belt Ido hope you're giving yourself enough . " ps yours ona you ug And really enjoyed all those long late credit for all you do. Life gets so " . complicated and…

AmbushedApostate and Nancy discuss her husband and her attraction to Elliott:

€ i) Nancy Viswanathan & Like he seems to have some sexual trauma. I'm a very playful person and he just kind of giggles and shies away. He's almost like a young boy Maybe it’s an Indian thing in general. Sex doesn’t seem to be a priority Yup. Always been this way It’s been almost a YEAR, Seth. And I'm not kidding ‘See why I'm frustrated? € w Nancy Viewenathenii tans deserve consistent sex and if that's not going to be possible for him for whatever reason, would start drafting a plan. . Unless you want to live like this indefinitely ‘And honestly, think you are going to slip with someone somewhere because of the factors we've already talked about and the that gets really messy Yeah, this may be the breaking point once he gets back. I'm hoping his father’s death changes something in him Not that you don’t have self control, but Pon teteeernaeexenesretineetre and it's understandable Yeah, and really don’t want to be a…

"Close to cheating" suggests the encounter was consensual on Nancy's part.

€ i) Nancy Viswanathan & ‘See my dilemma now? How a young, cute flavor like Elliott caught my attention ‘Sometimes really miss my wild days € i) Nancy Viswanathan % So Where does that leave you? Exactly! See how found myself in a questionable spot in Nashville? GE and KC know a lot about this assumed yall had this pom star sex life to be honest. I wish! know everything isn't always what it looks like but your vibes and everything kinda relayed that
Apostate Sister Patti 5/23/25, 1214 Pp d @dHellsBells not just controlling but demeaning, telling her how to do every little thing, telling her she's dumb in so many ways, and he had started trying to control me and the channel through her recently @1 0

NANCY'S SAFETY

in India, I began to open up about my sexual struggles with my husband and what may have led to me flirting with Elliott in the first place. These people included namely AJ of Ways to Human, Helen of Freethinker Fireside, Bre of HiveSci and Seth of Ambushed Apostate. I got very close to all of them. Little did I know, all of them would soon tum around to tell lies about me to protect my abuser... and betray my trust in the worst possible way!

After Jay's streams, we continued to privately express concern about Nancy. We did not betray Nancy. Patti made Nancy's story public, which was followed by witnesses sharing statements to clear false allegations Patti had made. Jay Bundy's first stream with Patti was December 9, 2025.

December 14, 2025:

©* Helen, Bre, KC, Se... <@ Ry Active now ‘ ‘ Xv « DEC 14 AT 3:34PM KC I'm not convinced that Nancy is hd steering the ship right now... Seen by everyone Helen Same. am worried this may be retraumating her and isolating her more. There was a road to redemption, but we can't do R that if she isnt given a voice 12 My husband and I tried to move on with our lives and forget this. We even removed every connection to the atheist community I had on every social media platform so I could have some peace of mind, and I stopped recording on my channel with no plans to return. This didn’t stop

Patti claimed Nancy's husband removed her access to communication, but later said Nancy removed herself from the community.

Patti told some people that Nancy was safe with her husband, while at the same time pulling several people into a group chat called "Nancy's Safety" and accusing the husband of being controlling. The letter states "WE" removed connections to the community. Given the different accounts, It is unclear how and why Nancy left the community.

Apostate Sister Patti 8/23/25, 10:13 AM: Yeah, I have always assumed he could see anything I send and she did too… Why we were using Snapchat mostly cuz those messages disappear by the next day. FUCK FUCK FUCK… She could be in real danger. NOT NICE. (You're Viewing Older Messages — Jump To Present)
1:02 am ul) 5G @ <@ gt KC, John \. we w Trou replied lV JUIN think nancy is in an incredibly difficult situation that she has to navigate carefully. So wouldn’... ¥ AUG 31 AT 7:24AM KC Glad your head is doing better! Also glad you're meeting up Ld with Seth. He’s wonderful. KC also hope Nancy is able to reach out to a few close friends soon. Right now just have to trust Patti when she says that Rt Nancy is safe with Sumanth. AUG 31 AT 8:01AM NP You replied to KC also hope Nancy is able to reach 6 aG © Aa ® it Oe 10:17 i _)) <@ Na Helen, Bre, KC, Se... wy Ga PR. Active now SEP 10 AT 1:15PM Bre mR What about Nancy's safety? Seen by everyone Bre can't imagine this is going over well among the mR Viswanathan household Bre Despite Patti starting a "Nancy Safety" group on Discord and sending family under false mR pretenses to check on her.
17:44 © oF il @ d i > > ©: Apostate Sister Pa..> © @& © ambushedapostate 08/23/2025 8:34 AM tsi = Yeah she's going completely silent with me too and very abruptly. , Apostate Sister Patti 03/23/2025 8:35 AM ard I'm trying to figure out how far his control is teaching right now. She's been fighting for her autonomy in this marriage for years &> ambushedapostate 08/23/2025 8:35 AM was’ = She's let me in a little bit with some of the stuff going on and she thought this may happen Yeah And my concern now is her emotional and physical well-being , Apostate Sister Patti 03/23/2025 8:36 AM ard Ok… 02:38 = 9 = wl @D ~o@: Apostate Sist CGC @& Q fs, Apostate Sister Patti 03/23/2025 9:31AM Hey Seth...I got this very concerning message from Nancy/her husband this morning. Will you please tell me if she seems to still be able to talk to you? 5:33 & * 4893% € 8 Nancy Chariton, S... : ! a je SP at @ Nancy catia. Patti, for the foreseeable future won't be able to be on our YouTube channel. Any messages you need to send me can go through this group chat 5:27 AM @RCS mes... o @ 5:33 & + £893% € 8 Nancy Charlton, S... : rr . er Seer @ Nancy cher iam. Patti, for the foreseeable future NV; won't… 23:16 & NEF ll LD f) i > (© “©: Apostate Sist..> © @ Q ditterence in her voice, omg & ambushedapostate 08/30/2025 8:22 PM ‘wis! — I'm just glad she's doin alright. Whatever all of that was happened very abruptly and I'm just glad she's good , Apostate Sister Patti 03/30/2025 8:23 PM Yes, very abruptly. had harsh words for her husband's Swift reaction to control her device a ene eee & ambushedapostate 08/30/2025 8:24 PM ‘asm Yeah that's totally not OK. There is no reason you should be completely controlling someone's communications. fe. Apostate Sister Patti 03/30/2025 8:26 PM i Right, that…
Apostate Sister Patti 8/23/25, 12:00 PM: I have a friend in Marshfield WI that would drive to get her if needed too. And take her wherever. HellsBells 8/23/25, 12:01 PM: Port Charlotte Florida. I have resources as far as getting her a plane ticket and all that if need be. Ember 8/23/25, 12:02 PM: I was thinking bus or train station, but yes, we only need to get her to a point of departure. HellsBells 8/23/25, 12:03 PM: That would work too. Whatever gets her here if she needs it.

Patti and Nancy's letter claim the community was cut off because we turned on Nancy, all the above messages were sent AFTER Nancy cut contact on August 22nd.

A week after contact was cut, Patti relies a message from Nancy to the Safety group sending love to them:

323800- 20 FO Nancy Safety > oy Cot Gee & choosing it. It sounds like there's some very ‘open conversations happening at home, She knows she has a lot of support here and that's def helped her. She sends love to everyone. e20 & Apostate Sister Patti 08/20/2025 813m Jalso told her that Suman's first reaction to lock down her communications was a very bad choice. She knows you all know his controlling ways now & that y'all are at the ready to help. @ L Sa) ® HellsBells 54 ACD 0s/20/20258:54 pm ‘<P We are here as she needs us. hope she finds a path that heals what is hurting

Last messages between KC Gleason and Nancy before Nancy cut contact:

As are you Okay, good. I'm glad to see that he hasn't been kicked out if the ACA You and John were the ones truly trusted the most with my story. And thank you for that :-) Yeah, AJ's been a great advocate in all this as well. Vv Everything worked out better than could've hoped for She's a gem. A wealth of knowledge. Truly an advocate for humans Delivered As are you \

Last messages Nancy and I exchanged the same day she cut communication with everyone:

Nancy Viswanathan, Active 23h ago. And I really wanted to thank you again for everything you handled for me the last couple weeks. Aw I'm just glad I was able to help, I care so much about all of you and it would have hurt so much to see you all hurt more than you already were! Elliott did great this weekend, he didn't drink at all, he just smoked his vape and kept saying he was just going with the flow, he was super chill the whole time. I hope you are feeling better physically and mentally too. AUG 22 AT 11:03 AM. Hey luv, I just emailed you viewer access to my content creator contact list. It does need to be updated again soon, but this will be a good start.

Nancy to AJ:

Nancy Viswanathan, Active 23h ago. And thank you for having such an amazing heart as well. I feel like you understood where I was coming from the entire time. This is the goal I wanted. Of course, I had to reschedule my original call with Maria about Planet Peterson for today because yesterday's call ended up being all about Elliot and none of us had the mental bandwidth to cover it, so I'll let her know later tonight on the call. I got you lady, I could see your big heart from miles away, and am blown away at your kindness. I hope this will be one of those forever…

TRAIN WRECK AJ

peace of mind, and I stopped recording on my channel with no plans to return. [his didn t stop people from trying to reach out to me. I received an extremely disturbing text from AJ Ruley on my cell (to which I had never given her the number or permission to contact me on). She

Not true. Nancy gave me her phone number in July 2025:

rid Nancy Viswanathan Whew! Lot of info. There's more details could add, but let me know if you @ have questions this far. My cellis9 -__.- 3

However, Nancy gave her husband MY phone number without permission and he contacted me.

on my cell (to which J had never given her the number OF permission to contact me On). one said unimaginable things such as, “I hope you’re hurting” and how I was a horrible person for supporting Elliott before turning around and calling him a predator. She also insinuated that I

July 29, 2025, Tuesday

The first day I talked to Nancy after I was informed of what happened at NaNoCon, I told her I hoped Elliott (SR) was hurting. I shared a private story about hurting a loved one years ago. I said my conscience was hurting and I felt horrible, so I hoped SR's conscience hurt in that sense. I did not know the full details of the alleged incident at the time I sent this message:

& Nancy Viswanathan ©. eo SldbhepesR shang Heteasrosthing, ‘

The text I sent Nancy (after the police investigation closed) referred to that conversation. It was meant to say if our conscience hurts, we are more likely to do the right thing because we care. I urged her to tell the full story, because she had left a path of destruction. I was hurt by her using me and had a human reaction.

September 13, 2025 — This is part of the text I sent Nancy, referenced in her letter.

Nancy, this is AJ. When you told me about the NaNoCon incident, we both agreed Elliott's response would reveal his character: was he a flawed human who took responsibility or a manipulative asshole? That same standard now applies to you. This is your moment to decide who you really are: someone who made serious mistakes and is willing to face them, or someone who chooses manipulation and dishonesty at the expense of others. (Stitched.) The pain you inflicted on your friends is real, and it can't be dismissed by pointing to your own suffering. You shut out people who tried to protect you, those who knew the true TRUTH, then you misled those who didn't know the full truth, using them to save your marriage and avoid guilt and embarrassment. You drew vulnerable people like [Witness 1], KC and Helen into situations that forced them to relive their worst sexual abuse traumas. That is serious harm, whether you intended to or not. (Right side, purple message bubble:) I told Elliott this when I first heard your claim, and will say it to you now: I hope you are hurting. Not because I want you to suffer, but because if you feel the weight of this, it means you still have a conscience. I don't see that in your actions currently, I hope I'm wrong.

* 'W1*' is Witness 1

si, Sonia, AOSTA SN and calling him a predator. She also insinuated that 1 had wanted to fuck Elliott that night and didn’t get what I wanted, so I was trying to protect myself from my husband knowing. This was shocking, confusing, and I didn’t know what she

I have provided screenshots throughout this document indicating Nancy initiated the sexual encounter and had consensually crossed physical boundaries, suggesting her desire to engage in a sexual encounter with Elliott. Nancy also admits to being "pushed into Elliott's arms" by her marital troubles.

Many of us were aware of this and followed her wishes of discretion before she cut us off and accused us of "hiding" things to protect Elliott. We have remained quiet to protect Nancy's privacy.

comfort now spat hate in my direction. When I showed my husband the text, he responded to AJ directly and told her to leave his wife alone and that my sexual past and preferences had nothing to do with the criminal acts committed against me. Though I don’t know what was said back, I know his phone was flooded with messages I had sent to all of the parties listed

Her husband's phone was not "flooded with messages". I sent ONE text response with screenshots of conversations between myself and Nancy to show I wasn't making things up.

I do regret this, I own my wrongdoings. When I sent that message I was affected very negatively by Nancy's behavior and felt it was the right thing, at THAT time. Explanations are not excuses.

It didn’t take long after my husband returned for him to sense something was wrong. I was more reserved, wasn’t sleeping well, and was even speaking differently. I eventually broke down and told him everything. After a very emotional few days, he convinced me that I absolutely needed to report this incident to the police. He knew I was someone who often got husband to leave me. They actually told him that I liked men to rape me! I suddenly knew exactly where all this came from. I remembered telling Elliott during one of our calls that I help women on my channel through their sexual trauma by suggesting they read dark erotica books in the genre of "consensual non-consent." I've found that reading this type of literature has helped me before when trying to reclaim my autonomy from a religion that taught me that my body was not my own, though not something I had ever done in real life or would ever do outside of my own husband. I made the connection… and realized I had far underestimated just how low Elliott would go to protect himself. He convinced my "friends" that I was actually the one who wanted some weird sexual rape fantasy and that he was just giving me what I wanted that night. It was beyond gross to hear.

Not true. "Liked men to rape me" was never mentioned. We have said "Nancy is into Consensual Non Consent" or as Nancy referred to it to Glenda Jordan "rape fantasy".

NONE of this information came from Elliott, it came from NANCY, who has admitted this publicly on her own channel and privately to SR, Helen and Bre.

solace in justice. People I’ve never spoken to chose to communicate through third parties in the form of train wrecks like AJ of Ways to Human, someone who was never directly involved,

"Never directly involved" is false. I was the first person to hear something happened from Patti, 2 days after the alleged incident (outside of those who heard in person). THEY involved me.

Certain people were told in person AT NaNoCon. Nancy and Patti themselves involved others online starting Monday 7/28/2025, some of whom had been at NaNoCon, such as myself.

July 28, 2025, Monday — 10:11 PM — Patti tells me something happened at NaNoCon:

€ t Patti Robrahn & [a 7/28/25, 10:11PM Hey there - hope your travel home went well! I've had a migraine today unfortunately, but have to talk to you about @ something very serious... a On Saturday night, Nancy was assaulted by Secular Rarity, Elliot.

10:30 PM — I call Patti and she tells me more, we speak until 11:47 PM:

& Patti Robrahn . en @ Okay Missed audio call @ 10:30PM 7/28/25, 11:47PM a Audio call 1 hr 15 mins

11:54 PM — Nancy emails a written statement to KC Gleason:

From: Nancy Viswanathan <) _ > Date: Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:54 PM Subject: Incident at NaNoCon To: ~— keg! € ~ Hey John and KC, I wanted to share something disturbing with you that happened on Saturday night at NaNoCon last weekend. trust you both completely with this information and

July 29, 2025, Tuesday — 8:14 AM — I contact Nancy, she forwards me the email she sent KC.

I talked to Nancy the next day and followed her lead as far as how much and how often we engaged. I periodically asked how she was doing if I had not heard from her.

@ Nancy Viswanathan 7/29/25, 6:38AM Hey, spoke to Patti last night and just wanted to say that anything you need, am here and support you. You have a crew on standby ready to come to your side, we > €0O all love you and will help you get through this, whatever happens. And if you need to not answer to this message right now and take time to process things, that is also a valid response. Take care of yourself. 7/29/25, 8:14AM Thank you, AJ. appreciate your support. Yeah, it's been a busy few days. I'll e certainly keep you informed. Hugs and love back solace in justice. People I’ve never spoken to chose to communicate through third parties in the form of train wrecks like AJ of Ways to Human, someone who was never directly involved,

Not true. Nancy repeatedly asked me to speak to third parties and thanked me for it.

The reason no one else heard about the alleged incident is because Nancy wanted it this way, we were respecting her wishes.

¢ *@ Nancy Viswanathan So « tor her Thank you for talking to everyone. got the sense that ( didn’t like my She also had very choice words about my! 8/2/25, 9:55AM. 4. You replied to Nancy Thank you for talking to everyone. got the sense that e Nancy Viswanathan & haven't yet. And you got to see all their snakes!? 2. Things are pretty good here. Sumanth is back home... and very sick @ but it's nice to have him back. We're heading up to Michigan at a friend's cabin next week for a little getaway And really wanted to thank you again for everything you handled for me the last couple weeks. You truly are an awesome person... with an awesome brain. @ Haha @ 8/20/25, 8:27 AM
the things being claimed. In organizations and board meetings I was reduced to Person A, as though I were some underage, fragile victim who couldn’t handle discussing what had happened to me instead of revealing me as I truly am: A highly educated, confident and successful woman in her 40s who’s been through this many times before without ever finding

This is framed as if it happened after Nancy or her husband cut contact with the community. This happened before contact was cut off, at Nancy's request:

July 29, 2025, Tuesday

Nancy and I discussed the protection of her identity (calling her Person A), she was aware she and others were being referred to as different letters. Patti was referred to as Person B and so on — this was to PROTECT Nancy, at her request.

@ Nancy Viswanathan = “Gilli 7/29/25, 9:15PM I'm glad you are ® KC texted me after speaking with SR so I messaged him like 15 mins later to tell him was about to go to the ACA board to tell them and if he wanted to be there, he could. He said he had actually just messaged: _to ask fora meeting and they were about to go on, so we decided to combine the 2. It was SR, {both the producers) and (board member told you fully trust). It was loooong! Hour and a half. He right away said he wanted to protect you from any backlash and your identity, so we called you “A” the entire time, we called…

July 30, 2025, Wednesday

& Nancy Viswanathan YG ew ¢ Thank you. Can you please pass along my decisions and outcomes with the ACA? I'd like him to still be involved in all those things as scheduled. As far as I'm concerned, this is now dealt with. He doesn’t need to be punished further And thank you for having such an amazing heart as well. feel like you understood @B_where was coming from the entire time. This is the goal wanted & Nancy Viswanathan Ok, hope everyone that knows can be understanding of your decisions and not spread this further, Elliott did his best to keep your name and dignity intact and detsuieivedir Walla tndacaccll Camvet's mocnabutiiiapeeplasam

August 5, 2025

8:36 AM — Nancy asked me to talk to Patti, who was violating Nancy's consent regarding decision making. I was shocked to hear on August 5 (a week after NaNoCon), Patti and Nancy had not spoken for days. It appeared Nancy was not comfortable talking to her sister. They had a show recording that day and could have spoken face to face. It seemed Nancy did not feel safe speaking to her sister honestly and openly:

& Nancy Viswanathan QQ 8/5/25, 8:36AM Hey AJ, wanted to reach out again about the SR incident because you seem like the right person to talk to. was wondering if you could speak with Patti. She and haven't really talked for days but people are telling me she’s out for blood. She's furious and ready to cut ties with the ACA and that could destroy everything we've worked for with our channel. We're set to come on Truth Wanted soon and she may cancel it. She also removed our interview with SR on our channel without asking my permission. know she's displeased with my decision to forgive him.… We have a recording today around noon, but she should be Ce around sometime after that

Texts between Nancy and Seth from AmbushedApostate discussing Patti not respecting Nancy:

€ oo) Nancy Viswanathan & I reached back out to AJ. think she’s gonna try to mediate a call between SR and Patti

Note: Patti declined speaking to SR.

Monday, Aug 4 22:39 You said Patti was pissed but damn <4 She's about ready to start a war with the ACA Oh boy... Vv She's about ready to start a war with the ACA ‘Oh boy... Calm your tits don't go texting her Yeah, know she’s fiery We were just talking but might make a drastic decision and I'm just wondering if she thought out the consequences and I'm trying to figure out how to talk to her about it
© @ weveyviswenethan % it happened If she wants to start a war, she should take that up with Eliott himself I just hope she doesn't make a decision it's going to hurt you guys as brand But don't want to downplay her emotions and her hurt either Yeah, was worried she might. didn’t want her to lose everything she’s worked for and Eliott was helping her € ® Nancy Viswanathan the ACA And that's not fair to you if you wanna do it Hmmm. She said she was still on board for that Well, don’t agree to her pulling Elliott’s interview on our channel either Oh hell I'm. Not starting sister drama am i Can you talk? No, Patti just tends to go off the deep end sometimes. She'll blame entire corporations for the wrongdoings of one person, and don’t agree to that

Nancy asked me repeatedly to speak to people for her. Claiming I was going around to orgs speaking on her behalf is false. She also asked me to reach out to a content creator she thought had made a video about the incident (it was not) on August 5:

& Nancy Viswanathan Agreed If Seth heard about this from [Witness 1], can only imagine that he's thinking the worst. @¥_ would love for him to hear about this from you and your compassionate heart ° & Nancy Viswanathan know that if she did tell ( Seth, it's because she trusts him, but it is a little discouraging to hear that others haven't respected your wishes that it not go Ipyfurther;

* 'W1*' is Witness 1

& Nancy Viswanathan @ Did you feel close to Seth? Are you two friends? © @& : ri Nancy Viswanathan NaNoCon as wel. The first time we met we kind of bonded about my cochlear implant because his father had one. Would you like me to talk to him? I did notice he talked about witch hunt and everyone jumping to assume someone is. 2 bad person, so that’s a good sign that he pointed that out I'm only about 5 mins in ‘Yeah, Ill let u watch and then decide. Might be nice if he heard the perspective directly from you Honestly, you're the person I've trusted the most throughout this ordeal. So whatever you decide is fine with me. ° {9 _"msure Seth will probably appreciate that did get his message

CHARGES AGAINST NANCY

August 22–30, 2025

According to the screenshots in Nancy's Safety section of this document, Nancy's husband seems to have found out on August 22nd that something had taken place. Patti indicates that's when he cut off her contact with the community. Patti, Helen, Bre, Ember and Maya continued making plans to get Nancy to safety until August 30th. On that day, Patti told them Nancy was now safe (with her husband) and suddenly stopped speaking to them.

September 1–2, 2025

Nancy filed a report with the Tennessee Park Rangers, the investigation was assisted by the Dickson County Sheriff's Office.

September 10, 2025

Investigation closed and false report charges were offered against Nancy.

Helen, Bre, KC, Secular. SEP 10, 2025 AT 12:33 PM. Secular: Hey y'all I feel like you deserve an update. The detective sat with the DA today. They have reviewed the evidence and statements already and even looked at video footage. They have concluded that the video does not match her statement and are considering pressing charges against her for filing a false police report. They have closed the investigation and will not be pressing charges against me.

We encouraged Elliott to file charges against Nancy for false reporting before the case closed. Elliott decided not to:

Helen, Bre, KC, Secular. SEP 10 AT 1:37 PM. Secular: Well y'all think on it over the next day or two if you want and if all of y'all say "yes Elliott you need to pursue charges" that will heavily influence my decision. Seen by everyone. Secular: And vice versa too. SEP 10 AT 1:40 PM. KC: If you want to just move on from it, let the state do what they do, but you drop it, that's reasonable. But if you decide you want to sue her, I think you'd be justified in doing so. I know you don't want any more harm to come to her. And that is sweet. But I'd also completely understand if you felt like clapping back. She would have been totally fine ruining your life and that's… fucked up.
Helen, Bre, KC, Se... Active now. SEP 10 AT 1:25 PM. Secular: As far as defamation or slander/liable goes unfortunately you have to wait for those things to occur before you can press charges or anything. Seen by everyone. Secular: And that would all be civil so I'd need to get a different attorney and provide them evidence etc etc. My plan currently (if my views matter at all in this regard) I wouldn't even press charges of a false report. I would rather this matter be as done and done as possible.
Helen, Bre, KC, Se... Active now. SEP 10 AT 1:55 PM. Secular: As crazy as it may seem I still just want safety and peace for everyone I want Nancy to continue doing shows and things. I just want this to be put to rest once and for all. Seen by everyone. Drew said she's not coming back to doing shows. Maybe Patti will, but sadly I don't think I could trust either of them enough to do shows with them, but I wouldn't be against them doing them. I do hope she can get to a good place in her marriage despite all this, but that will take her telling the truth and she lied to her husband for a whole month too, so that will take some repairing and painful processes too.

After the case was closed, Patti stated on Jay Bundy's stream that there was no video footage from the hotel and no false report charges considered against Nancy. The DA did offer to file false report charges against Nancy. After Elliott declined to file charges, the case was closed, but people around Nancy continued to spread false information and threats against witnesses. We suggested Elliott ask his lawyer whether the DA would be willing to reopen the case and file the charges originally offered. Email from Elliott's lawyer after the case was closed:

ae Q@ « : @) tome v ° Elliott - emailed the detective last week about getting something in writing. He was supposed to forward me an email from the DA. As for the video - unlikely. It's not technically discoverable at this stage in the process, especially since it’s a closed investigation. He was only going to pursue charges against her if you requested him to. If you want to unpack that more, let me know and we can schedule a call. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 16, 2025, at 8:26 AM, Elliott Martin

MY CLOSING STATEMENT

Seeking appropriate justice for alleged victims considers many factors: victim statements, witness accounts, photos, videos, texts, emails and other forms of evidence.

When Elliott told people to "believe Nancy", it was because he had no memory of many parts of the night (alcohol-induced blackout), it wasn't an admission of guilt, it was a plea to believe victims. None of us had reason to question Nancy's statements at the time he said it.

This document is not denying individuals got hurt. We know both got physically hurt, but how that happened, matters. According to Nancy, most of the night, she was less intoxicated than Elliott (her being "tipsy" vs him being "extremely drunk"). Witnesses confirmed this to authorities. A "tipsy" individual purchased drinks for and initiated a physical sexual contact with an "extremely drunk" individual.

a THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA APPLY VISIT GIVE Info For... Q Remember, if you are unsure whether someone is sober enough to consent, it is best to “play it safe” and not engage in any sexual activity. It is your responsibility as the person initiating the sexual act to obtain consent, even if you are also drunk or under the influence of drugs. This means that you can and will be held responsible for any acts of sexual violence that may occur.

At the time Nancy began to kiss Elliott in the lobby, according to her and all other witnesses, he did not have the capacity to consent, as he was severely intoxicated (described as incoherent and unstable on his feet, even falling outside). Nancy initiated the sexual physical contact in the lobby and recalled feeling she had asked Elliott to pull out his penis in the stairwell, indicating she was giving active consent.

When Someone Cannot Legally Give Consent Consent requires the ability to understand and voluntarily agree to a situation. Understanding when consent is legally invalid helps explain how courts determine responsibility and why these cases can unfold differently than people expect. Alcohol and Decision-Making Capacity > Courts assess whether a person could understand what was happening at the time. > Participation alone does not prove someone had the legal ability to agree. > Impairment level matters more than the amount consumed, with a focus on the effect on decision-making.

Nancy NEVER described Elliott coming in contact with her genital area. She has never mentioned him unbuttoning her pants or putting his hands inside them. When Nancy describes her shirt being pulled up, she never claims he touched her breasts or genitals.

Nancy DID describe she felt she had asked Elliott to pull out his penis, she bragged to Helen and Bre about having touched it. Aside from kissing, the only sexual contact in this encounter appears to be Nancy touching Elliott's penis.

Nancy gave us all the impression that Elliott stopped and left as soon as she gave clear verbal removal of consent, even if the behavior was rude, it did not appear to be criminal.

The allegation that Nancy was "thrown down the stairs and choked" is also unclear because Nancy stated to some that it was an accidental fall, which makes sense, since she describes Elliott falling down and knocking her over in the alcove, indicating he was not stable on his feet due to his level of intoxication.

This document reveals several false statements about witnesses, which seem to attempt to make our statements less credible. The document demonstrates Nancy intentionally told different versions of the story to different sets of people (including authorities) at the same time, from day one. Our understanding was that Nancy was protecting her marriage and safety, we followed her wishes for privacy. Patti and Jay Bundy made her story public, against her clearly stated wishes.

Trauma is complex. I do not deny Nancy experienced something that night. An accidental fall which leads to physical injury can be traumatic. The shame of social stigma, fear of a husband's wrath, or the idea of being humiliated can all be traumatic. Actions taken in order to preserve your safety at home can be traumatic in itself.

In the secular community we should value accountability, honesty and fairness. There is no question Elliott made the mistake of getting drunk at a public event, he has never denied it and has faced appropriate consequences: he was removed from his volunteer positions at NaNoCon, removed from speaking appearances, and underwent therapy.

This document needs to be analyzed and interpreted without bias toward gender norms, we must consider who had a responsibility to a severely intoxicated individual, we must be able to differentiate allegations of sexual assault vs simple assault and whether the harm that came from this encounter was intentional or not.

Maria A Ruley

Notary signature

State of Texas
County of Tarrant

This instrument was acknowledged before me by means of an interactive two-way audio and video communication on 05/06/2026 by Maria A. Ruley.

Texas Notary Public seal — Shannon Johnson, ID Number 134729043, Commission Expires January 24, 2028

Notary Public, State of Texas
Shannon Johnson

Shannon Johnson signature

Electronically signed and notarized online using the Proof platform.